While the three-fifths compromise brought all states on board to ratify the constitution, regional differences and continuing debates over slavery, representation, and laws ultimately caused a bloody civil war. 

How did the 3 5 compromise contribute to the Civil War?

It determined that three out of every five slaves was counted when determining a state’s total population for legislative representation and taxation. Before the Civil War, the Three-Fifths Compromise gave a disproportionate representation of slave states in the House of Representatives.

What was a major effect of the 3/5 compromise?

The Three-Fifths Compromise made it so that there were more Southern electors than there would have been had slave population not been counted, giving Southern power more influence in presidential elections.

What was the 3/5 compromise and why did it matter?

The “Three-fifths Compromise” allowed a state to count three fifths of each Black person in determining political representation in the House. It was an early American effort to avoid the intersectionality of race, class, nationality and wealth for political control.

How did the Constitutional Convention lead to the Civil War?

By recognizing and institutionalizing slavery, the war was inevitable. But this is not the only reason that the Constitution caused the Civil War. There was another, perhaps more important, reason that the founding fathers caused our particular sectional strife. This reason is the electoral college.

How did the issue of slavery contribute to the Civil War?

The war began because a compromise did not exist that could solve the difference between the free and slave states regarding the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in territories that had not yet become states.

What events led up to the Civil War?

Events Leading up to the Civil War

  • Compromise of 1850. September 9, 1850.
  • Fugitive Slave Act. September 18, 1850.
  • Publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin. 1851.
  • Kansas Nebraska Act. May 30, 1854.
  • Pottawatomie Massacre. May 25, 1856.
  • Dred Scott Decision. May 26,1857.
  • John Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry. October 16, 1859.
  • Election of 1860. 1860.

What was a direct outcome of the three fifths compromise?

The number of representatives in the House of Representatives from slaveholding states increased.

What was the impact of the 3/5 compromise quizlet?

What did the 3/5’s compromise determine? The 3/5’s compromise declared that three fifths of the slave population would be counted to determine representation and direct taxation.

What problem did the three-fifths compromise aim to address?

what issue did the three-fifths compromise solve? It solved the problem over how to count slaves when determining a state’s population for taxation and representation purposes.

What was the impact of the 3/5 compromise quizlet?

What did the 3/5’s compromise determine? The 3/5’s compromise declared that three fifths of the slave population would be counted to determine representation and direct taxation.

What was the main issue of the 3/5 compromise quizlet?



The Three Fifths Compromise resolved the issue of counting slaves towards population in regards to representation in the House of Representatives.

What was the main purpose of the Three Fifths Compromise quizlet?

what issue did the three-fifths compromise solve? It solved the problem over how to count slaves when determining a state’s population for taxation and representation purposes.

What two issues did 3 5th compromise solve?

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement, made at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, that allowed Southern states to count a portion of its enslaved population for purposes of taxation and representation.

What is the significance of the Three-Fifths Clause?

Article one, section two of the Constitution of the United States declared that any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation. The “Three-Fifths Clause” thus increased the political power of slaveholding states.