Bolívar was a superb general and leader and definitely won many more battles than he lost. Still, he was not invulnerable and did occasionally lose.

Why was Bolívar a good leader?

Bolivar successfully liberated modern-day Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuela. Successful in gaining support for his army of liberation and turning the tide of public opinion to support the idea of full independence.

What kind of leader was Bolívar?

Simón Bolívar was a Venezuelan soldier and statesman who played a central role in the South American independence movement. Bolívar served as president of Gran Colombia (1819–30) and as dictator of Peru (1823–26). The country of Bolivia is named for him.

Why was Simon Bolivar a tyrant?





Simon Bolivar Had Dictatorial Tendencies



He believed that a firm hand was needed at the controls for a few years while the dust settled. He put his beliefs into effect while President of Gran Colombia, ruling from a position of supreme power.

How was Simon Bolivar a hero?

Simon Bolivar is a hero because he has accomplished freeing thousands of unknown people from the Spanish rule. Bolivar is considered a hero throughout South America because of his leadership, braveness, and confidence for fighting for independence for six different countries.

What bad things did Simón Bolívar do?

Bolívar had enormous flaws, he made terrible mistakes. He would execute one person for treason and then let a very treasonous general get away with the same thing. He was uneven and trying to make it up as he went along.

Who is Simón Bolívar and why is he so important?



On July 24, 1783, Simon Bolivar was born in Caracas, in what is now Venezuela. Bolivar became the most powerful leader in South America, nicknamed “El Libertador” (the liberator) for helping nations become independent from Spain. Today, July 24 is celebrated as Simon Bolivar Day throughout Latin America.

What type of government did Simón Bolívar want?

In principle Bolivar was a democrat and he believed that government should be responsible to the people: ‘only the majority is sovereign; he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation’.



Did Bolívar execute prisoners?

Around February 1814, Bolívar ordered the execution 1,200 civilians, with explicit orders to summarily execute the Spaniards among them. Due to the scarcity of gunpowder, Bolivar’s forces executed many of the prisoners with pikes and swords, and were then finished off by crushing their skulls with rocks.

Why was Bolívar a dictator?

This would, he hoped, secure the presidency as an office for life and create a hereditary third chamber, thereby isolating this great nation from local politics and potential splintering. When the convention refused to ratify these changes Bolívar proclaimed himself dictator.

What are 3 facts about Simón Bolívar?

Top 10 Facts about Simon Bolivar

  • His actual name is quite long. …
  • Simon Bolivar was extremely wealthy before the Wars of Independence. …
  • He dedicated his wealth to the independence movements in South America. …
  • The death of his wife changes the course of his life. …
  • He handed over Francisco de Miranda to Spanish authorities.

Did Bolívar become a dictator?



Not only did Bolivar successfully make congress declare him Dictator, but he also propelled and obtained the odd approval of a life-long Constitution with himself as President for life.

Why did Bolívar give up on his dream?

He believed that his popularity as liberator would make it easier to impress his ideas upon the peoples and obtain their support of his grand scheme. Unfortunately for Bolivar, there were to be many disheartening realities that he could no longer avoid, which would result in the failure of his dreams.

What did Simon Bolivar do for slavery?

After his return to Venezuela, Bolívar kept the same position on slavery as six months earlier: he implied that slavery had ended, but he offered freedom to male slaves and their family only if the former enlisted in the patriot army.

Did Simon Bolivar believe in slavery?

The mestizos — the fusion of European, African and Indian races — were not one of Bolivar’s main concerns. Further, even though Bolivar was an abolitionist and promised to abolish slavery, near the end of his life he asked the forgiveness of South American Indians for having paid so little attention to their needs.

What is Simon Bolivar known for?



On July 24, 1783, Simon Bolivar was born in Caracas, in what is now Venezuela. Bolivar became the most powerful leader in South America, nicknamed “El Libertador” (the liberator) for helping nations become independent from Spain. Today, July 24 is celebrated as Simon Bolivar Day throughout Latin America.

What was Simon Bolivar fighting for?

Simón Bolívar was a revolutionary and a political leader whose courageous battles for Latin self-rule led to the establishment of Venezuela, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Panama as independent nations.

What did Simon Bolivar believe in?

Bolivar believed in liberty and equality, and these were the foundations of his revolution. From Montesquieu he inherited a hatred of despotism and a belief in moderate constitutional government, in the separation of powers and the rule of law. But liberty in itself is not the key to his political system.

What was Bolívar’s ultimate goal?

Describe what Bolivar’s ultimate goal for South America was. His goal was to make most South American countries independent and free from Spanish rule.

Why was Bolívar a dictator?

This would, he hoped, secure the presidency as an office for life and create a hereditary third chamber, thereby isolating this great nation from local politics and potential splintering. When the convention refused to ratify these changes Bolívar proclaimed himself dictator.

What did Bolívar think was wrong with the Spanish system of colonization?



What did Bolivar think was wrong with the Spanish system of colonization? It was oppressive to people not born in Spain. Why might the Spanish government have forbidden colonists to grow crops that could be grown in Europe? To keep them dependent on buying them from Spain.

Where is Simon Bolivar sword?

The M-19, or “Eme” as they were called colloquially, were emboldened with Bolívar’s sword, until a year after their demobilization in 1990 with a peace process, that the movement’s political leader Antonio Navarro returned the sword to the Colombian government and rightful place inside Quinta de Bolívar.

How much is Simon Bolivar’s sword worth?

Maduro gives Simon Bolivar’s SWORD to Putin, hits Red Square, hails cooperation with Russia (VIDEOS) Published time:

Did Pablo Escobar have Simon Bolivar’s sword?

In 1974, leftist guerrilla group M-19 stole the sword from Bolivar’s country house, a museum outside of Bogota. The sword then supposedly passed to the hands of infamous drug trafficker Pablo Escobar, in return for favors granted to the M-19.

What did Simon Bolivar died of?



Simon Bolivar (Figure 1), “the Liberator,” died in 1830 after a protracted illness. According to history books, he died of tuberculosis (2).

What were Simon Bolivar’s last words?

Some accounts hold that Bolivar’s delirious last words were the puzzling: “Damn it! How will I ever get out of this labyrinth?” Others maintain that he said: “Fetch the luggage. They do not want us here,” before giving up the ghost.

How did Simon Bolivar impact the world?

Bolívar was a revolutionary leader in the independence wars of South America and strove to liberate colonies from the Spanish Empire. He led Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, Ecuador, and Peru to their independence and even briefly united them as a single nation called Gran Colombia.

How many battles did Bolívar win?



Simón Bolívar (1783-1830) known as “The Liberator” fought in more than 200 battles against the Spanish in the fight for South American independence. Bolívar provided the political and military leadership that freed Bolivia, Colombia (then including Panama), Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela from the Spanish rule.

Why was Simón Bolívar bad?

Bolívar had enormous flaws, he made terrible mistakes. He would execute one person for treason and then let a very treasonous general get away with the same thing. He was uneven and trying to make it up as he went along. When you’re operating like that — everything impromptu — it’s difficult to build anything coherent.