In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), using the Supreme Court’s precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in state legislatures must be apportioned equally on the basis of population rather than geographical areas, remarking that “legislators represent people, not acres or trees.” In…

What principle did the Supreme Court develop from Baker v Carr?

Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state’s drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

What is the importance of the Supreme Court case Reynolds v. Sims?

Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.

What did the Supreme Court decision Baker v Carr establish quizlet?





In Baker v Carr (1962), the supreme court ruled that a state legislature would have to redraw their representative districts in order to comply with the Constitution.

What is the importance of the Supreme Court case Reynolds v. Sims quizlet?

What is the importance of the Supreme Court case Reynolds v. Sims and Baker v. Carr? It declared the constitutional principle of “one person, one vote.”

What principle did Reynolds v Sims 1964 decide?

Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964) Equal protection requires that state legislative districts should be comprised of roughly equal populations if possible.

What was the impact of the Baker v Carr decision in the Supreme Court?



It remanded numerous other apportionment cases to lower courts for reconsideration in light of the Baker and Reynolds decisions. As a result, virtually every state legislature was reapportioned, ultimately causing the political power in most state legislatures to shift from rural to urban areas.

How did the principle the Supreme Court established in Reynolds v United States limit the free exercise of religion?

More important, the Court created a belief-action dichotomy for free exercise clause cases. It held that the federal government cannot interfere with a person’s religious beliefs, except when a religious practice violates certain notions of health, safety, and morality — commonly called police powers.



What did the Supreme Court rule in Reynolds v United States?

The Court upheld Reynolds’s conviction and Congress’s power to prohibit polygamy. The Court held that while Congress could not outlaw a belief in the correctness of polygamy, it could outlaw the practice thereof.

How did the Court ultimately resolve the issue in Reynolds v. Sims?

In an 8-to-1 decision authored by Justice Earl Warren, the Court upheld the challenge to the Alabama system, holding that Equal Protection Clause demanded “no less than substantially equal state legislative representation for all citizens….” Noting that the right to direct representation was “a bedrock of our

What was the importance of Baker v. Carr quizlet?

What is the significance of Baker v Carr.? The Court held that that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question, thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases.

Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for decision in Baker v. Carr?



Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law.

What is the significance of the Supreme Court decision?

First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power.

What was the significance of the Supreme Court ruling in Shaw v Reno?

Using the Shaw v. Reno decision, the justices decided that using racial reasons for redistricting is unconstitutional. Since Georgia’s General Assembly used “race for its own sake and not other districting principles,” their actions were rendered unconstitutional.

What is the significance of the Supreme Court decision in Brown vs Board of Education?

In this milestone decision, the Supreme Court ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional. It signaled the end of legalized racial segregation in the schools of the United States, overruling the “separate but equal” principle set forth in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case.

What is the significance of the 1937 Supreme Court case?



In the pivotal 1937 Jones and Laughlin case, the Supreme Court saved the Act in a 5-to-4 decision upholding its constitutionality. The Court sustained Congress’s power to regulate employers whose operations affect interstate commerce, even though they were not directly engaged in commerce.

Was the 1937 Supreme Court case that established the principle of selective incorporation?

Ultimately, the Court adopted the selective incorporation doctrine in the 1937 case of Palko v. Connecticut.

What was the main reason why the Supreme Court was created?

The Constitution granted the Supreme Court ultimate jurisdiction over all laws, especially those in which their constitutionality was at issue. The high court was also designated to oversee cases concerning treaties of the United States, foreign diplomats, admiralty practice and maritime jurisdiction.