New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that First Amendment freedom of speech protections limit the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. The case emerged out of a dispute over a full-page advertisement run by supporters of Dr.

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in the New York Times versus Sullivan quizlet?

Why was New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) significant? The justices ruled that a newspaper had to print false and malicious material deliberately in order to be guilty of libel.

What was the NY Times Supreme Court case?

v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the First Amendment right of Freedom of the Press.

What gave rise to the lawsuit New York Times v Sullivan quizlet?





Sullivan was the police commissioner of Montgomery, Alabama. Sullivan, claiming his reputation had been damaged by an advertisement in the New York Times, sued both the Times and the sponsors of the advertisement for defamation.

What was the summary of New York Times v United States?

New York Times v. United States, better known as the “Pentagon Papers” case, was a decision expanding freedom of the press and limits on the government’s power to interrupt that freedom.

Why did the Court rule in favor of the New York Times in the Pentagon Papers case?

Decision for New York Times Company



In its per curiam opinion the Court held that the government did not overcome the “heavy presumption against” prior restraint of the press in this case.
26 июн. 1971 

What does the Supreme Court case New York Times vs United States say about the Pentagon Papers?



This case is also known as The Pentagon Papers Case. The articles revealed information pertaining to the US’ involvement in the Vietnam War. The court ruled in favor of the newspaper’s publications.

What was the outcome of the ruling in New York Times v United States?

Supreme Court allowed Times to continue publication



In a 6-3 decision, the Court dissolved the restraining order and allowed the Times to continue with publication.



What resulted from the Supreme Court ruling in New York Times v Sullivan 1964 quizlet?

What did the Supreme Court rule in New York Times v. Sullivan? The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 9, 1964, in The New York Times v. Sullivan that the Constitution prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood related to his official conduct.

Why is the New York Times v Sullivan case relevant to defamation lawsuits?

New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that First Amendment freedom of speech protections limit the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. The case emerged out of a dispute over a full-page advertisement run by supporters of Dr.

What caused New York Times v United States?

The decision by the New York Times and Washington Post to print illegally leaked, classified documents about American involvement in the Vietnam War sparked a First Amendment battle between the highest levels of government and two of the most respected newspapers in the country.

What was one reason the New York Times started to use objective reporting quizlet?



History suggests that objective reporting grew out of an opportunity to mass-market news that would not offend particular groups.

Why is the New York Times vs US an important court case?

In this ruling, the Court established a “heavy presumption against prior restraint,” even in cases involving national security. This means that the Court is very likely to find cases of government censorship unconstitutional.

Why is the New York Times important to journalism?

The New York Times is dedicated to helping people understand the world through on-the-ground, expert and deeply reported independent journalism.