Liberal interpretation means interpretation agreeing to what the reader believes the author reasonably intended. But, a liberal interpretation does not necessarily mean an interpretation that would accomplish a change in former practice.

What is the meaning of liberal in politics?

Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), liberal democracy, secularism, rule of law, economic and political freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion,

What does strict interpretation mean?

Definitions of strict interpretation
understanding and explaining the meaning of something based only on what the reader believes the author must have been thinking at the time the text was written.

What is a liberal minded person?

A liberal is someone who is open-minded and progressive in their views. An example of liberal is someone who likes new ideas that will bring progress even if they are not traditional. adjective.

What does construed liberally mean?

in large amounts; generously; abundantly:Sprinkle liberally with paprika, sea salt, and chili oil. in a way that is not strict, literal, or rigorous: This charter shall be liberally and broadly construed in favor of allowing the city to exercise its power.

What is the difference between strict interpretation and loose interpretation?

The Loose interpretation states that the Federal government can do what is good for the country even if the Constitution doesn’t explicitly allow it, but the Strict interpretation states that the Federal government can only do what the Constitution says it can do.

What is strict vs loose interpretation of the Constitution?

Strict construction describes a philosophy of constitutional interpretation that emphasizes a narrow reading of the plain text of the U.S. Constitution. Loose construction describes an approach that emphasizes the ways that historical context should change the way we interpret constitutional provisions.

What is another word for liberally?

What is another word for liberally?

lavishly amply
freeheartedly openhandedly
abundantly plentifully
copiously plenteously
profusely richly

What is liberal construction in interpretation of statutes?

Liberal or beneficial Construction means the interpretation should be made liberally with the intention to advance the purpose or object of the statute. Thus, in the case of strict interpretation, Courts may prefer the literal rule while liberal construction courts may prefer the golden rule or mischief rule.

What is the antonym of liberally?

coldly, coolly. (also cooly), frigidly, hostilely.

Is liberal opposite of generous?

Liberal.

What is the synonym of conservative?

traditionalist, traditional, conventional, orthodox, stable, old-fashioned, dyed-in-the-wool, unchanging, hidebound. cautious, prudent, careful, safe, timid, unadventurous, unenterprising, set in one’s ways. moderate, middle-of-the-road, temperate. informal stick in the mud.

What does the word laissez faire meaning?

allow to do

The French phrase laissez faire literally means “allow to do,” with the idea being “let people do as they choose.” The origins of laissez-faire are associated with the Physiocrats, a group of 18th-century French economists who believed that government policy should not interfere with the operation of natural economic …

Which part of speech is the word liberalism?

LIBERALISM (noun) definition and synonyms | Macmillan Dictionary.

What do strict constructionists believe?

In the United States, strict constructionism is a particular legal philosophy of judicial interpretation that limits or restricts such interpretation only to the exact wording of the law (namely the Constitution).

What does the term strict constructionist mean?

Definition of strict constructionist
: one who favors giving a narrow conservative construction of a given document or instrument specifically : one who favors a strict construction of the Constitution of the United States — compare loose constructionist.

What is an example of strict construction?

Justices that are described as strict constructionists tend to favour State’s rights over the rights of the Federal Government. They tend to be labelled as conservatives. Perhaps the most famous example of this is the interpretation of the First Amendment by Associate Justice Hugo Black.

What does loose interpretation of the Constitution mean?

Alexander Hamilton and his followers favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant they believed that the document permitted everything that it did not expressly forbid. This contrasted sharply with Thomas Jefferson’s strict interpretation.

What political party has a loose interpretation of the Constitution?

With respect to the federal Constitution, Jeffersonian Republicans are for the “strict” interpretation of the Constitution, while the Federalist Party and its supporters are in favor of the “loose” interpretation.

Why would a person who believes in a strict interpretation of the Constitution?

Why would a person who believes in a strict interpretation of the Constitution have a concern with the elastic clause? The elastic clause limits the ability of the government to respond to new needs of the nation. The elastic clause gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in a limited number of cases.

Which of the following would be an example of strict interpretation of the Constitution?

Vetoed the Bank’s re-charter which destroyed the Bank.
Jackson felt the Bank was unconstitutional and is an example of strict interpretation of Constitution.

Why should Constitution be interpreted loosely?

A flexible interpretation allows for issues of civil rights and justice to be settled more efficiently, because it takes only one case for a landmark decision granting rights to minorities to be made, an example being Brown v. Board of Education.

Who has the final authority for interpreting the Constitution?

The Supreme Court

As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is “distinctly American in concept and function,” as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed.

What is a narrow interpretation of the Constitution?

A theory of interpretation of the Constitution that holds that the courts, particularly the Supreme Court, should be bound by the exact words of the Constitution, or by the original intent of the framers of the Constitution, or a combination of both.

What are the 5 types of interpretation that can change the Constitution?

Introduction There are five sources that have guided interpretation of the Constitution: (1) the text and structure of the Constitution, (2) intentions of those who drafted, voted to propose, or voted to ratify the provision in question, (3) prior precedents (usually judicial), (4) the social, political, and economic

What are the two main approaches to interpreting the Constitution?

Two different paradigms have been developed; one, within the common law system, the Judicial Review and the other, within the civil law system, the Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Each constitutional review system was developed in accordance with a different constitutional tradition and understanding.

What does a broad interpretation of the Constitution mean?

Definitions of broad interpretation. an interpretation of the U.S. constitution holding that the spirit of the times and the needs of the nation can legitimately influence judicial decisions (particularly decisions of the Supreme Court) synonyms: judicial activism.

Why is interpretation of the Constitution Important?

Thus, interpretation is necessary to determine the meaning of ambiguous provisions of the Constitution or to answer fundamental questions left unaddressed by the drafters.

Who interprets what the Constitution says and how?

Federal courts enjoy the sole power to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases. The courts, like Congress, can compel the production of evidence and testimony through the use of a subpoena.